The alliance pick
that leaves
nothing to chance.

View Full Analysis
🏆 THE DATA-DRIVEN PICK FOR YOUR ALLIANCE
EMV Analysis Risk Matrix Reliability Volatility Phase Coverage
Alliance Checklist
Verify EMV
Compare Volatility
Assess Plan B
Confirm picks
+ New check
9:41
🔋
Alliance Portfolio
Feb 5 → Mar 5 ▾
···
Alliance Portfolio
N
B
Feb 5 → Mar 5
$ 191,750
EMV Left for 3 rounds
Today
Pick #1 68%
$100.3K
Pick #2  32%
$91.5K
Total EMV
$191.8K
Overview
Picks
Risk
N
Nighthawk Dynamics
Pick #1 · EMV
+$100,250
B
ByteForce Legion
Pick #2 · EMV
+$91,500
Validated by
EMV Analysis
Risk Matrix
Reliability Audit
Volatility Index
🔬 Phase Coverage
The Challenge

Alliance selection is a
portfolio construction problem.

Picking the highest-ranked team is not the optimal strategy. The right question: which combination maximises expected output while minimising correlated failure risk?

phantom loss
$52,750

Rank ≠ Value

IronClad ranked #2 yet had the 9th-best EMV. Their 50% reliability turned a $95K gross into a $42.3K expected value — a $52,750 phantom number hidden behind the ranking.

Rating
#2 / 11
EMV rank
#9 / 11
IronClad: largest rating → EMV gap in the entire pool.
70%

Single-Elimination Risk

In playoff brackets, one zero-output match ends your run. Teams with 70% reliability are actuarially certain to fail in 3-round formats — and two teams in this pool had exactly that rate.

A
T
E?

Phase Coverage Gaps

A winning alliance covers all three match phases — Auto, TeleOp, Endgame. Picking two specialists in the same phase creates a systematic gap opponents can exploit every round.

Our Framework

Five lenses.
One decision.

Every team scored independently on five dimensions. A team must clear all five thresholds to be considered a recommended pick — no single metric decides alone.
Lens 01

Phase ROI

Return-on-investment per Auto, TeleOp, and Endgame phase — normalised across the 11-team pool.

Lens 02

Reliability

% of matches without a zero-phase failure. Below 80% = automatic exclusion from consideration.

Lens 03

Volatility

Match-to-match score standard deviation. Low volatility = predictable, bankable playoff contributor.

Lens 04

EMV

Net Revenue × Reliability. The honest metric — adjusts for crash risk before comparing teams.

Lens 05

Investment Appeal

EMV ÷ Volatility — the Sharpe Ratio for robotics. Rewards consistent earners, penalises boom-bust.

Phoenix Vipers robot in competition
Qual Record
9 – 1 – 0
Wins · Losses · Ties
Robot in Action

Built to compete.
Proven in the field.

Phoenix Vipers team competed in the FTC "Into the Deep" season — posting qualification results that placed us among the top alliance candidates in the regional pool.

145.2
Avg Ranking Score
9
Qual Wins
100%
Auto Reliability
The Recommendation

Two picks. Zero compromise.

After filtering 11 teams through five analytical lenses, two teams cleared every threshold with a margin that makes the decision unambiguous.

Pick #1 — Primary Partner
Nighthawk Dynamics
Team #27309 · Ranked #3
$100.3K
EMV (Best Pool)
100%
Reliability
0.15
Volatility
Zero failed auto phases across all qualification matches. 9.5× Auto ROI and 20.0× TeleOp ROI — highest ceiling in the pool. Lowest penalty rate (1.1 pts/match). Covers our Auto and Endgame gaps precisely.
Pick #2 — Secondary Partner
ByteForce Legion
Team #33012 · Ranked #5
$91.5K
EMV
$761K
Appeal
0.12
Volatility
Lowest volatility among top-5 (0.12). Investment Appeal of $761K signals strongest programme momentum. TeleOp specialist (58.0 pts avg). Operator-role flexibility allows mid-match strategy adaptation.
Key Findings

Three insights that changed
the entire selection.

These discoveries emerged from data — not visible from rankings alone. This is why scouting alone isn't enough.

Phantom Loss
$52,750

The IronClad Phantom

IronClad's $95K gross collapsed to a $42.3K EMV once 50% reliability was factored in. A $52,750 phantom number. Their failed inspection made it moot — but the lesson is: reliability is a multiplier, not a footnote.

EMV Collapse
Gross Rev.
$95K
×
Reliability
50%
=
EMV
$42.3K
Phantom gap
−$52,750
not visible from rankings
Interval Failure
M3 · M6 · M9

The Quantum Foxes Pattern

M1 ✓M2 ✓ M3 ✗ M4 ✓M5 ✓ M6 ✗ M7 ✓M8 ✓ M9 ✗

Quantum Foxes failed exactly matches 3, 6, and 9 — a perfect interval suggesting thermal or fatigue failure. In a 4-round single-elimination bracket, this is near-certain disqualification. Completely invisible from rank #8.

Hidden Gem
$923K

Nomad's Hidden Value

Rank #10 Nomad Robotics holds the highest Investment Appeal in the pool at $923K, driven by near-zero volatility (0.08). They become contingency Pick #2 if ByteForce is taken by another alliance captain.

Contingency Pick #2
The Team

The people
behind the data.

Phoenix Vipers — competing in the FTC "Into the Deep" season. Every number in this analysis was earned on that field.

Phoenix Vipers team
Watching the robot run quals
Phoenix Vipers at championship table
Alliance selection table
Phoenix Vipers competition venue
Competition day, field view
11
Teams Evaluated
5
Analytical Dimensions
97%
Recommendation Confidence
$191K
Portfolio EMV
Ready to Dive In?

Explore everything behind
the decision.

Browse the full scouting database, interactive charts, risk matrix and radar comparison — or open the Formula Lab to model your own scenarios in real time.